Linux webserver 6.8.0-49-generic #49~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Nov 6 17:42:15 UTC 2 x86_64
Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu)
Server IP : 192.168.1.1 & Your IP : 13.59.225.66
Domains :
Cant Read [ /etc/named.conf ]
User : www-data
Terminal
Auto Root
Create File
Create Folder
Localroot Suggester
Backdoor Destroyer
Readme
/
usr /
share /
doc /
vsftpd /
Delete
Unzip
Name
Size
Permission
Date
Action
SECURITY
[ DIR ]
drwxr-xr-x
2024-09-18 19:48
examples
[ DIR ]
drwxr-xr-x
2024-09-18 19:48
AUDIT
1.36
KB
-rw-r--r--
2008-02-02 01:30
BENCHMARKS
2.84
KB
-rw-r--r--
2008-02-02 01:30
BUGS
822
B
-rw-r--r--
2012-03-28 03:21
FAQ.gz
4.97
KB
-rw-r--r--
2011-12-17 19:34
NEWS.Debian.gz
446
B
-rw-r--r--
2024-07-11 12:59
README
1.33
KB
-rw-r--r--
2021-07-31 20:08
README.Debian
3.1
KB
-rw-r--r--
2024-07-11 12:59
README.security
112
B
-rw-r--r--
2008-02-02 01:30
README.ssl
2.07
KB
-rw-r--r--
2008-02-02 01:30
REWARD
125
B
-rw-r--r--
2008-02-02 01:30
SIZE
392
B
-rw-r--r--
2008-02-02 01:30
SPEED
1.14
KB
-rw-r--r--
2008-02-02 01:30
TODO
1.79
KB
-rw-r--r--
2012-04-05 01:27
TUNING
1.23
KB
-rw-r--r--
2008-02-02 01:30
changelog.Debian.gz
1.23
KB
-rw-r--r--
2024-07-16 07:52
copyright
1.63
KB
-rw-r--r--
2024-07-11 12:59
Save
Rename
- See also BENCHMARKS This FTPd should be very performant. The reasons for this are below, followed by specific benchmarks as and when I get them. 1) Generally, it is a fairly minimal FTPd. There should not be much code and/or syscall bloat. 2) For binary downloads, Linux sendfile() is used. This is a lot lighter on CPU/syscall usage than your regular read()/write() loop. 3) The "ls" command is fully internal. That is to say, an external "ls" command does not need to be launch. Launching an external process is costly because of the fork(), exec(), ELF loader startup, etc. It is not all good news, of course. Potential sources of poor performance include 1) Overhead of two processes per session (in some common configurations). 2) Excessive heap usage hidden behind the string API. BENCHMARKS ========== 1) vsftpd downloads ASCII data at at least twice the rate of wu-ftpd. 2) vsftpd has achieved 86Mbyte/sec download over Gigabit ethernet between Linux-2.4.x boxes (thanks to sendfile()) 3) vsftpd has smaller virtual memory usage (and RSS, it seems) 4) Various reports have trickled in and indicate that vsftpd thumps wu-ftpd in performance tests.